[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[debbugs-tracker] Processed (with 4 errors): Re: bug#9927: 24.0.90; unex
From: |
GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: |
[debbugs-tracker] Processed (with 4 errors): Re: bug#9927: 24.0.90; unexec/unexmacosx fails with GCC 4.6.1 |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:24:02 -0400 |
Processing commands for address@hidden:
> Am 29.06.2012 um 19:03 schrieb Samuel Bronson:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> > I suppose, though, that if we could be sure that we aren't linking in any
> > static libraries with these *new* BSS sections which will have trouble
> > because of Emacs' dumping them, we could just skip that part; then all we'd
> > need to do is make sure that my_endbss_static refers to an address in
> > __DATA.__bss, not __DATA.__bss1 or __DATA.bss2 like it would naturally end
> > up at on GCC 4.6 or 4.7 (respectively). (And make unexmacosx.c dump these
> > new BSS sections, of course.)
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Apple itself states in
> http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#qa/qa1118/_index.html that they "do
> not support statically linked binaries on Mac OS X." And from my experience
> it's really a bit complicated to build them. So your approach should be OK
> and work in the average case. And those few, if at all, who try to build
> static Emacsen on Mac OS X might need something else...
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> --
Stopping processing here.
No commands successfully parsed; sending the help text(s).
Sending instructions for address@hidden in separate message.
Please contact address@hidden if you need assistance.
GNU bugs database, http://debbugs.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [debbugs-tracker] Processed (with 4 errors): Re: bug#9927: 24.0.90; unexec/unexmacosx fails with GCC 4.6.1,
GNU bug Tracking System <=