emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#11547: closed (24.0.96; Was a line accidentally co


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#11547: closed (24.0.96; Was a line accidentally commented out in callproc.c?)
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 11:27:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 24 May 2012 07:24:36 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#11547: 24.0.96; Was a line accidentally commented out 
in callproc.c?
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #11547,
regarding 24.0.96; Was a line accidentally commented out in callproc.c?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
11547: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11547
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.0.96; Was a line accidentally commented out in callproc.c? Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:03:21 -0400 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In the course of trying to debug a Cygwin crash, I noticed that line 643 of callproc.c is commented out. This was done in bzr revision 103252, and it seems pretty clear from the context of that change that it was done by accident:

revno: 103252
committer: Jan D <address@hidden>
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Sun 2011-02-13 12:28:42 +0100
message:
  * callproc.c (Fcall_process):
  * process.c (create_process): Replace Gtk with GConf in SIGPIPE
  comment.
modified:
  src/ChangeLog
  src/callproc.c
  src/process.c
diff:
=== modified file 'src/ChangeLog'
--- src/ChangeLog       2011-02-13 00:16:28 +0000
+++ src/ChangeLog       2011-02-13 11:28:42 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2011-02-13  Jan Djärv  <address@hidden>
+
+       * callproc.c (Fcall_process):
+       * process.c (create_process): Replace Gtk with GConf in SIGPIPE
+       comment.
+
 2011-02-12  Martin Rudalics  <address@hidden>

        * window.c (select_window): Check inhibit_point_swap argument when

=== modified file 'src/callproc.c'
--- src/callproc.c      2011-02-12 18:53:24 +0000
+++ src/callproc.c      2011-02-13 11:28:42 +0000
@@ -559,9 +559,9 @@
         setpgrp (pid, pid);
 #endif /* USG */

-       /* GTK causes us to ignore SIGPIPE, make sure it is restored
+       /* GConf causes us to ignore SIGPIPE, make sure it is restored
           in the child.  */
-       signal (SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL);
+       //signal (SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL);
 #ifdef HAVE_WORKING_VFORK
        sigprocmask (SIG_SETMASK, &procmask, 0);
 #endif

=== modified file 'src/process.c'
--- src/process.c       2011-02-12 18:53:24 +0000
+++ src/process.c       2011-02-13 11:28:42 +0000
@@ -2056,7 +2056,7 @@

        signal (SIGINT, SIG_DFL);
        signal (SIGQUIT, SIG_DFL);
-       /* GTK causes us to ignore SIGPIPE, make sure it is restored
+       /* GConf causes us to ignore SIGPIPE, make sure it is restored
           in the child.  */
        signal (SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL);


I don't understand the code well enough to know how critical this is. The comment preceding that line suggests that it could be a problem for a build with GConf support.

Ken




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#11547: 24.0.96; Was a line accidentally commented out in callproc.c? Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 07:24:36 -0400 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
Please go ahead and install it on the emacs-24 branch (only: not on the
trunk).

Installed as bzr revision 108013 on the emacs-24 branch; I'm closing the bug.

Ken



--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]