tag 10619 notabug thanks On 01/26/2012 07:09 PM, Lobo Oscuro wrote: Apologies that I am replying in English; while I can mostly read Spanish, I am not fluent enough to compose a reply in that language. > > Se necesita el ejecutable ./install pero mirando los pasos en ningun > momento compila install.c y no se obtiene el ejecutable para ser instalado en > /usr/local/bin/install , se necesita los ejecutables ./install y > ./install-info para continuar con la instalacion del mismo paquete: > > /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ./coreutils.info '/usr/local/share/info' > install-info --info-dir='/usr/local/share/info' > '/usr/local/share/info/coreutils.info' Those two command lines do _not_ imply that you need ./install nor ./install-info (that is, executables found in your current working directory), but rather the version of 'install' and 'install-info' as found via a $PATH search. You probably never want to run './install' or './install-info', but should instead run 'install' (for a PATH search) or '/usr/bin/install' (for an absolute path of the installed binary). > > Mirando la documentacion no dice nada relacionado con eso. Pero estoy > seguro que asi como ese hay muchos archivos que no son compilados porque hay > mas codigos fuentes que ejecutables compilados. > I'm assuming that you are using a GNU/Linux system, in which case it is safe to assume that these two programs (install is from coreutils, install-info is from info) are pre-installed and that your PATH is probably already set up to use them. There's generally no need to rebuild a local copy of either of these applications into your current working directory. I will go ahead and close out this bug report, but we can reopen it if you can provide more information relevant to the situation, or even a suggestion of where to make a documentation patch that would have helped you out in the first place. -- Eric Blake address@hidden +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---