emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#10454: closed (23.3; Different result from `C-h k'


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#10454: closed (23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k')
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:22:02 +0000

Your message dated Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:19:48 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? 
k'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #10454,
regarding 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
10454: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10454
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k' Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 11:36:42 +0000
If I have ido-mode enabled, the output of `C-h k C-x C-f' is:

> C-x C-f runs the command ido-find-file, which is an interactive
> compiled Lisp function in `ido.el'.


But if I'm just learning Emacs and I do `C-h ? k C-x C-f', the output is for 
(non-ido) find-file:

> C-x C-f runs the command find-file, which is an interactive compiled
> Lisp function in `files.el'.


I'm not sure what causes this. `help-for-help' in `help.el' seems to use the 
same `help-map' that binds `C-h k' to `describe-key'; I couldn't understand the 
`make-help-screen' macro so that's as far as I got with my investigation.

I reproduced this on Emacs 23.3 and a 2012-01-08 nightly build of 24.0.92.1 
(revno: 106821).

Recipe starting from `emacs -Q':

M-: (ido-mode t)
C-h k C-x C-f
C-h ? k C-x C-f

Thanks,
Dave.




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#10454: 23.3; Different result from `C-h k' and `C-h ? k' Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:19:48 +0100
> I can now confirm that Martin's patch does work
> for me. :-)

Installed in revision 106895 on trunk.

> Thank you all for all your help.

Thank you for the precise report.

martin


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]