[debbugs-tracker] bug#10452: closed (24.0.92; calendar-abbrev-length in calendar.el)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:19:55 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#10452: 24.0.92; calendar-abbrev-length in calendar.el
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #10452,
regarding 24.0.92; calendar-abbrev-length in calendar.el
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
10452: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10452
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> 24.0.92; calendar-abbrev-length in calendar.el
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 8 Jan 2012 11:59:02 +0100
>
>
>
>
> Hello!
>
> The introduction of this variable is no good idea. In German we are using two 
> values: the number 2 for day names and the number 3 for month names.
>
> --
> Greetings
>
>   Pete
>
> To most people solutions mean finding the answers. But to chemists solutions
> are things that are still all mixed up.
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#10452: 24.0.92; calendar-abbrev-length in calendar.el
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:19:55 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> tags 10452 notabug wontfix
> severity 10452 wishlist
> stop
>
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> > Peter Dyballa <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >> The introduction of this variable is no good idea.
>
> It exists since Emacs 22.
>
> > You can set calendar-day-abbrev-array to anything you like.
>
> Indeed. calendar-abbrev-length only provides a default set of
> abbreviations. I'm not going to introduce separate length variables for
> days and months.
>
>
> --- End Message ---