emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debbugs-tracker] bug#9557: closed (24.0.50; "y-or-n-p" does not clear t


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [debbugs-tracker] bug#9557: closed (24.0.50; "y-or-n-p" does not clear the echo area)
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:25:02 +0000

Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:16:19 +0300
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#9557: 24.0.50; "y-or-n-p" does not clear the echo area
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #9557,
regarding 24.0.50; "y-or-n-p" does not clear the echo area
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
9557: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9557
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: 24.0.50; "y-or-n-p" does not clear the echo area Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:19:54 +0200
Hi,

In my init file, I have `(fset 'yes-or-no-p 'y-or-n-p)' in order to
speed up the "yes/no" answers.  But I've just seen a minor problem
associated to it.

>From "emacs -Q":
1. Eval: (fset 'yes-or-no-p 'y-or-n-p)
2. Visit some file.
3. M-x revert-buffer <RET> y
--> (Expected) The echo area ends up empty (as happens if you omit step #1).
--> (Observed) The echo area remains with a residual text "Revert
buffer from file <your-file>? (y or n)  y".


In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2011-09-12 on 3249CTO
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.5) --no-opt'

-- 
Dani Moncayo



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#9557: 24.0.50; "y-or-n-p" does not clear the echo area Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 21:16:19 +0300 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
tags 9557 notabug wontfix
thanks

> But if no one else thinks that this change is worthwhile, you can
> close this bug report.

I doubt that anyone might want to miss information about the incorrect answer.
IOW, more information is better than less information.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]