[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#5361: closed (.elcs should tell more about the .els they were compiled from)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:15:36 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#5361: .elcs should tell more about the .els they were 
compiled from
has caused the GNU bug report #5361,
regarding .elcs should tell more about the .els they were compiled from
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
5361: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5361
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> .elcs should tell more about the .els they were compiled from
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:29:27 +0800
>
>
>
>
> Let's try to compare two .elc files to see if they are different.
>
> $ diff -a *.elc
> 2,4c2,4
> < ;;; Compiled by address@hidden on Sat Jul 25 03:33:07 2009
> < ;;; from file /home/jidanni/tmp/emacs-w3m/w3m-dtree.el
> < ;;; in Emacs version 23.0.96.1
> ---
> > ;;; Compiled by address@hidden on Thu Jan  7 04:59:34 2010
> > ;;; from file /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/w3m/w3m-dtree.el
> > ;;; in Emacs version 23.1.91.1
> ...
> Well, what would really help is if along with mentioning which .el file
> the .elc file was compiled from, would be adding checksum and some ls -l
> information about the .el file. Else it is really hard figuring out if
> the .elcs are really derived from the .els currently nearby. (And no,
> nobody wants to compile again just to see.)
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#5361: .elcs should tell more about the .els they were	compiled from
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:15:36 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> No. I don't see a need to keep this report open.
>
>
> --- End Message ---