emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#8570: closed (glibc getcwd does not handle long


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#8570: closed (glibc getcwd does not handle long file names properly?)
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:55:02 +0000

Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:54:00 +0200
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#8570: glibc getcwd does not handle long file names 
properly?
has caused the GNU bug report #8570,
regarding glibc getcwd does not handle long file names properly?
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
8570: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8570
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: glibc getcwd does not handle long file names properly? Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:12:37 +0200 User-agent: KMail/1.9.9
Hi,

building coreutils 8.12 on a Linux 2.6.25.20, glibc 2.8 machine, "make check"
shows these lines:

  ./misc/pwd-unreadable-parent: skipping test: can't use buggy system getcwd
  SKIP: misc/pwd-unreadable-parent

REPLACE_GETCWD is indeed 1, because the test from m4/getcwd-path-max.m4 failed:

configure:26992: checking whether getcwd handles long file names properly
configure:27154: gcc -m32 -march=i586 -std=gnu99 -o conftest -g -O2 -Wall 
-I/arch/x86-linux/gnu/include -m32 conftest.c  >&5
configure:27154: $? = 0
configure:27154: ./conftest
configure:27154: $? = 12
configure: program exited with status 12

But is that known and expected that glibc 2.8 getcwd() does not handle
long file names??? And yes, I do have /proc mounted and readable by everyone.

Bruno
-- 
In memoriam Marian Batko <http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marian_Batko>
<http://en.auschwitz.org.pl/m/index.php?Itemid=8&id=478&option=com_content&task=view>



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#8570: glibc getcwd does not handle long file names properly? Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:54:00 +0200
Jim Meyering wrote:
...
> Subject: [PATCH] tests: remove useless test: misc/pwd-unreadable-parent
>
> * tests/Makefile.am (TESTS): Remove misc/pwd-unreadable-parent.
> This test was misleading and useless (was always skipped).
> Inspired by a report from Bruno Haible: http://debbugs.gnu.org/8570
> * tests/misc/pwd-unreadable-parent: Remove file.

I've pushed that, so am closing the ticket.
Thanks again.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]