emacs-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#7993: closed (cut segmentation fault with unboun


From: GNU bug Tracking System
Subject: [Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#7993: closed (cut segmentation fault with unbounded ranges)
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 07:37:01 +0000

Your message dated Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:45:36 +0100
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#7993: Acknowledgement (cut segmentation fault with 
unbounded ranges)
has caused the GNU bug report #7993,
regarding cut segmentation fault with unbounded ranges
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
7993: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7993
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message --- Subject: cut segmentation fault with unbounded ranges Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 18:20:11 +0000 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100826 Thunderbird/3.0.7
In coreutils 8.9 (latest), the following commands trigger an invalid
memory access.

cut -c1234567890- --output-d=: foo
cut -f1234567890- --output-d=: foo
cut -b1234567890- --output-d=: foo

The number 1234567890 is just a random number 'big enough' to make the
invalid access generate a segmentation fault but the invalid access
happens for values as low as 8 (valgrind)

The problem is that ranges going to end of line (i.e., 'x-') are not
taken into account when calculating the size of the printable_field
vector, but their lower bound is used as an index on line 525:

  if (output_delimiter_specified
      && !complement
      && eol_range_start && !is_printable_field (eol_range_start))


Paul



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: bug#7993: Acknowledgement (cut segmentation fault with unbounded ranges) Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:45:36 +0100
> Please ignore this. It's a duplicate submission of bug# 7992

Ok.  marking it closed.


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]