[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#6188: closed (progmodes/sh-script.el)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2010 12:08:05 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#6233: 24.0.50; sh-mode error due to lack of prog-mode
has caused the GNU bug report #6233,
regarding progmodes/sh-script.el
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)


-- 
6233: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6233
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> progmodes/sh-script.el
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 14 May 2010 07:59:21 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228)
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> sh-mode fails with:
> File mode specification error: (void-function prog-mode)
> sh-mode: Symbol's function definition is void: prog-mode
>
> Reason:
> ;;;###autoload
> (define-derived-mode sh-mode prog-mode "Shell-script"
>
> there is no such thing as an prog-mode.
>
> 2010-05-13  Stefan Monnier  <address@hidden>
>     * progmodes/sh-script.el (sh-mode): Use define-derived-mode.
>
> Regards
> Emmett
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#6233: 24.0.50; sh-mode error due to lack of prog-mode
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 21 May 2010 12:08:05 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> Nathaniel Flath wrote:
>
> > That fixed the issue.  Thanks!
> [...]
> >> Works fine for me. Please update your checkout, bootstrap, and
> >> re-test.
>
> Thanks; bug closed.
>
>
> --- End Message ---