[Emacs-bug-tracker] bug#5384: marked as done (Treatment of addresses in /usr/lib/debbugs/process )

[Emacs bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:21:42 -0500
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: Bug#5384
has caused the Emacs bug report #5384,
regarding Treatment of addresses in /usr/lib/debbugs/process 
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact address@hidden
immediately.)


-- 
5384: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5384
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Treatment of addresses in /usr/lib/debbugs/process 
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:47:36 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> Package: debbugs.gnu.org
>
> I think /usr/lib/debbugs/process is ok now, but to make it all really
> correct, here are the changes I'd like to make at some point. This is
> all for new reports only:
>
> Use get_addresses to scan every address in the input To: and Cc: headers.
>
> (There should not be any CC: header in a new report, but rather an
> X-Debbugs-CC header instead. Should we insert a warning or something if
> there was a CC header?)
>
> In the To: header in the mail that gets sent out, replace any instances
> of address@hidden (using variables rather than hard-coding; ie the
> submission address), or bug-gnu-emacs (variable; ie the maintenance
> address), or emacs-pretest-bug (would have to be hard-coded) with
> address@hidden (ie the bug number).
>
> (See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-01/msg00543.html )
>
> Put all other addresses in the CC: header, including any X-Debbugs-CC
> header (see bug#1780).
>
> (Note that the To: and CC: headers in the mail are just for display and
> are separate from the actual addresses that the mail gets sent to.)
>
> Then there will no longer be a need to insert a Mail-Followup-To header.
>
> Finally, remove any duplicate addresses.
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: Bug#5384
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:21:42 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
>
>
>
>
> Implemented.
>
>
> --- End Message ---