Re: [Duplicity-talk] bash completion for duplicity

[edgar . soldin]

yeah,

would have to be implemented cleanly of course. see no disadvantage though in 
having command line parameters parsed earliest.

but it's all rhetorical anyway as long as nobody implements argparse first ;).. 
ede/duply.net

On 26.06.2018 21:10, Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> Reading through the docs, it wants to execute duplicity during the 
> autocomplete to get the options, and leave no side effects.  That could be 
> problematic.
> 
> ...Ken
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 7:54 AM edgar.soldin--- via Duplicity-talk 
> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
> 
>     On 26.06.2018 14:49, Aaron wrote:
>     > Without digging into the detail, this:
>     > http://argcomplete.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
>     > apparently automatically collects options for bash completion from 
> argparse, which feels like a sensible approach.
>     >
>     > Moving from Optparse to Argparse is on the roadmap already anyway:
>     > https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/1480565
> 
> 
>     agreed, this approach looks much cleaner than a manually maintained list 
> of options.. ede/duply.net <http://duply.net>
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Duplicity-talk mailing list
>     address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>     https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>