[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.7 slowness
From: |
Philip Jocks |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.7 slowness |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:07:19 +0200 |
> Am 31.07.2016 um 22:52 schrieb edgar.soldin--- via Duplicity-talk
> <address@hidden>:
>
> On 31.07.2016 20:47, Philip Jocks via Duplicity-talk wrote:
>> Hej,
>>
>>> I am unable to reproduce this at all. What is the filesystem where the
>>> archive-dir lives, what type?
>>>
>>> What OS? Why not upgrade to 0.7.09 from the PPA or the tarball?
>>
>> It’s FreeBSD 10, archive-dir is UFS.
>> I wasn’t aware of 0.7.09 (duplicity.nongnu.org still links to 0.7.08 btw),
>> just installed it with `python setup.py install —user` and seems to be way
>> faster than 0.7.07.1 (13sec), which is good enough for me, though running it
>> without —name is still <1sec.
>>
>
> weird, Phil could you please attach/post/pastebin the first 50 lines of a max
> verbose run '-v9'?
> please run once with -name and the other time without.
Here you go:
without —name: http://pastebin.com/raw/qCEKvm8D
with —name: http://pastebin.com/raw/hGREtEPk
This time, I noticed these lines when running with —name:
Processing local manifest
/var/.duply-cache/duply_zzz_local/duplicity-inc.20160630T150316Z.to.20160630T150715Z.manifest
(77341545)
[ PAUSE, where it is probably actually doing something ]
Found manifest volume 1
Found manifest volume 2
Found manifest volume 3
…
Found manifest volume 316
Found manifest volume 317
Found 317 volumes in manifest
So does —name cause duplicity to process manifest files that aren’t processed
without —name?
Cheers,
Philip
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] duplicity 0.7 slowness,
Philip Jocks <=