[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed
From: |
edgar . soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jul 2016 12:46:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 |
Chris,
the gpg.py looks good.
can you run your duplicity command in in another terminal htop and enable tree
view. than you can observe in real time which processes duplicity starts and
what memory is used by whom. goal is to find out whether duplicity itself
amasses memory or if there gpg processes keep lingering around or whatever eats
up the memory.
..ede/duply.net
On 14.07.2016 03:43, Chris Vanden Berghe via Duplicity-talk wrote:
> Hi Edgar,
>
> I installed Duplicity from
> http://ppa.launchpad.net/duplicity-team/ppa/ubuntu. I have attached my
> gpg.py.
>
> Boto might have been upgraded, but difficult to say for sure. I
> currently have 2.38.0 from
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-boto installed. To test I
> have installed 2.34.0 and 2.40.0, and both yield the same result.
>
> Regards,
> Chris.
>
> ---
> On 13/07/2016 17:26, edgar.soldin--- via Duplicity-talk wrote:
>> On 13.07.2016 08:54, Chris Vanden Berghe via Duplicity-talk wrote:
>>> But what about the root cause? Version 0.6.x has worked without issue
>>> for many months (years?).
>>>
>>> Is there a particular reason why memory usage has increased
>>> significantly with version 0.7.x? Is Duplicity 0.7.x expected to use
>>> more than 1.4GB for a backup?
>> nope. not at all. in the past memory leakage happened due to a patched
>> duplicity by maintainers. where did you get you duplicity? can you post
>> 'duplicity/gpg.py' of your installation?
>>
>> as you are the first with that issue, maybe it is not duplicity at all but
>> your boto library. did you change it's version during the upgrade as well?
>>
>> ..ede/duply.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
- [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed, Chris Vanden Berghe, 2016/07/11
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed, Remy van Elst, 2016/07/11
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed, Chris Vanden Berghe, 2016/07/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed, Mark Grandi, 2016/07/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed, Nate Eldredge, 2016/07/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed, Chris Vanden Berghe, 2016/07/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed, edgar . soldin, 2016/07/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed, Chris Vanden Berghe, 2016/07/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed,
edgar . soldin <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed, Chris Vanden Berghe, 2016/07/14
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity process killed, edgar . soldin, 2016/07/15
- [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: Re: Duplicity process killed, edgar . soldin, 2016/07/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: Re: Duplicity process killed, Chris Vanden Berghe, 2016/07/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: Re: Duplicity process killed, edgar . soldin, 2016/07/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: Re: Duplicity process killed, edgar . soldin, 2016/07/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: Re: Duplicity process killed, Kenneth Loafman, 2016/07/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: Re: Duplicity process killed, Chris Vanden Berghe, 2016/07/16
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: Re: Duplicity process killed, covici, 2016/07/16
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Fwd: Re: Duplicity process killed, Chris Vanden Berghe, 2016/07/16