[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full <num> and decryption
From: |
Dirk-Willem van Gulik |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full <num> and decryption |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:02:37 +0100 |
> On 29 Oct 2015, at 12:57, Dirk-Willem van Gulik <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>> On 29 Oct 2015, at 12:41, Kenneth Loafman <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> The newest versions do not. What version are you running?
>>
>
> the ‘un’stable branch: duplicity 0.7.02 under python 7. Worth going to the
> 7.05 — nothing springs out in the release messages.
No joy on 7.05
$/usr/local/bin/python2.7 /usr/local/bin/duplicity-7.05 \
remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full 2 \
--ssh-options "-oIdentityFile=/home/backup-xxx/backup-xs-key” \
pexpect+sftp://address@hidden
Synchronizing remote metadata to local cache..
GnuPG passphrase: …
ctrl-C
$
which version should I go to ?
> Dw
>
>
>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik <address@hidden>
>> wrote:
>> Can someone help me understand why the ‘remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full’ et.al.
>> flags of a pub-key-ed backup require the decryption key (while the basic
>> info needed seems accessible to flags like collection-status without such
>> key) ?
>>
>> Much appreciated,
>>
>> Dw
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
- [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full <num> and decryption, Dirk-Willem van Gulik, 2015/10/28
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full <num> and decryption, Kenneth Loafman, 2015/10/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full <num> and decryption, Dirk-Willem van Gulik, 2015/10/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full <num> and decryption,
Dirk-Willem van Gulik <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full <num> and decryption, Kenneth Loafman, 2015/10/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full <num> and decryption, Dirk-Willem van Gulik, 2015/10/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full <num> and decryption, Kenneth Loafman, 2015/10/30
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full <num> and decryption, Scott Hannahs, 2015/10/30
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] remove-all-inc-of-but-n-full <num> and decryption, Dirk-Willem van Gulik, 2015/10/31