Re: [Duplicity-talk] Duplicity .cache directory to another path

[Benjamin Henrion]

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:53 PM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 06.07.2015 16:41, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:34 PM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On 06.07.2015 15:55, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am using duply wrapper on top of duplicity, which creates
>>>> /home/user/.cache directory when it runs.
>>>>
>>>> This cache directory is problematic because it takes space, and I want
>>>> to move it to another partition.
>>>>
>>>> I have set the ARCH_DIR in duply config to another location, but
>>>> duply/duplicity still creates  /home/user/.cache directory.
>>>>
>>>> Any idea if there is an option to handle this?
>>>>
>>>
>>> what is your duplicity version? moving the archive folder is supported 
>>> since duplicity 0.6.01 only.
>>
>> From squeeze:
>>
>> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=duplicity
>>
>> 0.6.08b
>>
>>> also please run duply with the --preview option and post the terminal 
>>> output. obfuscate information you deem private in it!
>>
>> TMPDIR='/home/user/backupdir' AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID='XXXXXXXXX'
>> AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY='YYYYYYYYY' /usr/bin/duplicity incr
>> --no-encryption --verbosity '4' --exclude-globbing-filelist
>> /home/user/.duply/mybackup/exclude /home/user/data
>> 's3://s3.amazonaws.com/mybox/'
>>
>
> please download the latest duply from
>  http://duply.net/
>
> place it somewhere suitable eg. /usr/local/bin/ and run it w/ preview. please 
> send me the _complete_ terminal output this time. obfuscate if needed!
>
> be advised.. duplicity 0.6.08b is very old (5+yrs), consider installing the 
> latest duplicity from tarball.

Doing it, but the main link on the frontpage gives a 404 error:

latest release (duply_1.9.2.tgz)

http://duply.net/projects/ftplicity/files/latest/download

-- 
Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403
"In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
democratically elected legislators."