Re: [Duplicity-talk] Big bandwidth bill from Rackspace

[edgar . soldin]

it's taken a year but good things etc. here is the change's branch
https://code.launchpad.net/~ed.so/duplicity/manpage.verify

..ede


On 10.06.2013 23:13, James Patterson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013, at 01:36 PM, address@hidden wrote:
>> On 10.06.2013 21:56, James Patterson wrote:
>>> I'm not seeing it... can you help me out?
>>>
>>
>> "
>> verify [--file-to-restore <relpath>]
>>     Enter verify mode instead of restore. If the --file-to-restore option
>>     is given, restrict verify to that file or directory. duplicity will
>>     exit with a non-zero error level if any files are different. On
>>     verbosity level 4 or higher, log a message for each file that has
>>     changed. 
>> "
>>
>> if you think that's to unclear feel free to provide a modified text. i
>> could wrangle it into a patch then.
> 
> Thanks. I would suggest:
> 
> Enter verify mode instead of restore. This will restore each file from
> the latest backup and compare it to the local copy.
> If the --file-to-restore option is given, restrict verify to that file
> or directory. duplicity will exit with a non-zero error level if any
> files are different. On verbosity level 4 or higher, log a message for
> each file that has changed. 
> 
> But one moment: that man page is from duplicity, not from duply. If
> duply is aimed at being the friendlier more convenient front-end to
> duplicity, then there really needs to be a mention of it in duply's man
> page.
>