Re: [Duplicity-talk] [Duplicity-team] Python 2.6.0 testing

[Michael Terry]

That first one is "expected" in the sense that I see it.  But so far only with box.com, and not, for example, that address@hidden account.  If you try other providers, does backendtest pass?

The second error there looks similar, in the sense that a get() call failed to download the file.  I've seen bugs filed against 0.6.x that look similar.

-mt

On 18 May 2014 06:43, <address@hidden> wrote:

Mike, still no luck, although the host error has vanished.

running ./testing/manual/backendtest, gives the 404, see below [1].

running manually works for first backup and collection-status but fails on second backup (incremental) with temp file missing [2]. i could reproduce it with python 2.6.0 and 2.7.6 .

..ede

[1]

======================================================================
ERROR: test_get (__main__.webdavsTest)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/srv/www/vhosts/host/dupl-trunk.webdav-0.7/testing/manual/../../testing/unit/test_backend_instance.py", line 53, in test_get
    self.backend._get('a', getfile)
  File "/srv/www/vhosts/host/dupl-trunk.webdav-0.7/testing/manual/../../duplicity/backends/webdavbackend.py", line 387, in _get
    raise e
BackendException: Bad status code 404 reason Not Found.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 220 tests in 24.561s
FAILED (errors=1)


[2]

Backtrace of previous error: Traceback (innermost last):
  File "/srv/www/vhosts/host/dupl-trunk.webdav-0.7/duplicity/backend.py", line 367, in inner_retry
    return fn(self, *args)
  File "/srv/www/vhosts/host/dupl-trunk.webdav-0.7/duplicity/backend.py", line 543, in get
    "from backend") % util.ufn(local_path.name))
 BackendException: File /tmp/duplicity-pbzbBZ-tempdir/mktemp-Ncg2Pw-2 not found locally after get from backend

Attempt 1 failed. BackendException: File /tmp/duplicity-pbzbBZ-tempdir/mktemp-Ncg2Pw-2 not found locally after get from backend

On 18.05.2014 03:50, Michael Terry wrote:
> Ed, now that the 2.6.0 compatibility stuff landed, does trunk work well for you with webdav?
> -mt
>
>

> On 13 May 2014 09:07, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
>     On 13.05.2014 14:56, Michael Terry wrote:

>     > On 13 May 2014 08:19, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     > Version of py26 in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS: 2.6.5
>     >     > Version of py26 in Debian oldstable: 2.6.6
>     >     > Version of py26 in RHEL6: 2.6.6
>     >     >
>     >     > I'm not pushing to drop support for py26 <2.6.5, just noting that it's getting hard for users to acquire those lower py26 versions.
>     >
>     >     who would want to install old runtimes except devs in need to support older environments.
>     >
>     >
>     > I just meant that users who have py26 <2.6.5 are "dying off" so to speak, as only users who installed a distro 4+ years ago and have not yet moved off of the now-EOL version have it.  All new installs or users on supported distros have modern py26 versions.
>     >
>
>     yeah.. nothing lasts forever. that can be a good thing indeed! ..ede
>
>