[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?
From: |
edgar . soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy? |
Date: |
Fri, 24 May 2013 12:03:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
yeah.. if encryption is not needed btar is a viable option. ..ede
On 24.05.2013 11:52, Mikołaj Czyż wrote:
> Thank you very much for your replies.
>
> Tahoe-LAFS sure looks interesting (if too complicated for my needs). And I
> will start testing btar, that looks just like what I need.
>
> Best.
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:55:24PM +0200, Mikołaj Czyż wrote:
> > But having one extra volume as a XOR result seems (naively) like not so
> > complicated idea, doesn't it?
>
> Exactly, that's why I implemented it in my case.
>
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Mikołaj Czyż wrote:
> > > > Thanks. But as duplicity uses checksums extensively, etc. why not
> add
> > > some
> > > > level of redundancy?
> > > > (on the other hand I believe there must be good reasons not to
> implement
> > > it
> > > > if it is still not there)
> > >
> > > In fact I don't use duplicity much; I use mainly a program I wrote,
> > > 'btar', and
> > > there I added at least one block of redundancy with XOR. :)
> > >
> > > More redundancy is a bit more complicated (requiring lots of memory).
> > >
> > > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell <
> > > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:35:13PM +0200, Mikołaj Czyż wrote:
> > > > > > Are there any works on adding some form of archive redundancy to
> > > > > duplicity?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I understand correctly one bit-flip can destroy the whole
> > > duplicity
> > > > > > backup, am I right?
> > > > >
> > > > > It will destroy one file of the backup, I think. The backup has
> > > multiple
> > > > > files.
> > > > >
> > > > > It will require hand work, but it's not that the whole backup will
> > > > > disappear,
> > > > > iiuc.
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Duplicity-talk mailing list
> > > > > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> > > > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Duplicity-talk mailing list
> > > > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> > > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Duplicity-talk mailing list
> > > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> > >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Duplicity-talk mailing list
> > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
- [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Mikołaj Czyż, 2013/05/23
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Lluís Batlle i Rossell, 2013/05/23
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Mikołaj Czyż, 2013/05/23
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Lluís Batlle i Rossell, 2013/05/23
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Mikołaj Czyż, 2013/05/23
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Lluís Batlle i Rossell, 2013/05/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Mikołaj Czyż, 2013/05/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?,
edgar . soldin <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, Lluís Batlle i Rossell, 2013/05/24
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, edgar . soldin, 2013/05/24
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, edgar . soldin, 2013/05/23
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Redundancy?, zooko, 2013/05/23