[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?
From: |
edgar . soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses? |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:10:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 |
in bin/duplicity probably here
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~duplicity-team/duplicity/0.6-series/view/head:/bin/duplicity#L383
also you should research the code that was added when --no-compression switch
was added.. search changelog for a circa point in time and then look in the
repositories history for the commit that added it.
i have the feeling something was lost, removed erroneously somewhen, as i
recall it worked after the switch was included.
..ede/duply.net
On 06.03.2013 20:59, Cory Coager wrote:
> If someone can point me in the right direction I can. I tried
> troubleshooting this yesterday by hacking the code and wasn't able to get it
> working. Where should I be looking?
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:21 PM, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> wrote:
>
> thanks for following up. could we interest you in fixing this? any
> contribution is valued lots.
>
> ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net>
>
> On 06.03.2013 18:33, Cory Coager wrote:
> > Bug ticket id is 1029516.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Cory Coager <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>
> wrote:
> >
> > The resultant files are indeed gzipped as I was able to manually
> uncompress them. This may be related to the bug you speak of and I updated
> the ticket yesterday.
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, March 6, 2013, <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>
> wrote:
> > > i see.. so it can be mistaken, cause it only tries to interpret
> what file type it may be?
> > >
> > > anyway, sigtar, difftar should be untarable with tar, right? so
> he could try that.
> > >
> > > or, just to find out if it compresses: backup a quite big plain
> text/sql dump file.. the resulting volume will be significantly smaller if it
> really compresses although forbidden.
> > >
> > > ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net> <http://duply.net>
> > >
> > > On 06.03.2013 16:27, Michael Terry wrote:
> > >> He means running "file XXX".
> > >>
> > >> "file" is a standard GNU/unix command to determine what a file
> actually is (rather than just by filename).
> > >>
> > >> -mt
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 6 March 2013 04:18, <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> <mailto:address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 06.03.2013 03:02, Cory Coager wrote:
> > >> > I'm using --no-encryption and --no-compression for a
> backup. I noticed the files have a .difftar extension instead of
> .difftar.gz. However, running a file against these shows that they are still
> gzip'd with max compression. Why is this happening? Am I missing something?
> > >> >
> > >> > I'm using version 0.6.21 from Ubuntu ppa.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> shouldn't be.. how do you test? what do you mean by "
> running a file against these "?
> > >>
> > >> i wouldn't advise to use --no-compression. afaik it has a
> bug in restoring currently.. check the launchpadpad bug tracker.
> > >>
> > >> ..ede/duply.net <http://duply.net> <http://duply.net>
> <http://duply.net>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> > >> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> <mailto:address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>
> > >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> > >> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> > >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Duplicity-talk mailing list
> > > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> <mailto:address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Duplicity-talk mailing list
> > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
- [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Cory Coager, 2013/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, edgar . soldin, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Michael Terry, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, edgar . soldin, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Karl O. Pinc, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Cory Coager, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Cory Coager, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, edgar . soldin, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Cory Coager, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?,
edgar . soldin <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Cory Coager, 2013/03/06
- Message not available
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Cory Coager, 2013/03/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, edgar . soldin, 2013/03/07