[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?
From: |
Karl O. Pinc |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses? |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:51:42 -0600 |
On 03/06/2013 09:42:57 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> i see.. so it can be mistaken, cause it only tries to interpret what
> file type it may be?
Yes, file can be mistaken. But I've never seen it be mistaken.
It uses the magic numbers at the beginning of the file
as part of the heuristic.
If it is mistaken you should be able to report a bug
to file and have it fixed.
Karl <address@hidden>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
- [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Cory Coager, 2013/03/05
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, edgar . soldin, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Michael Terry, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, edgar . soldin, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?,
Karl O. Pinc <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Cory Coager, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Cory Coager, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, edgar . soldin, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Cory Coager, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, edgar . soldin, 2013/03/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Cory Coager, 2013/03/06
- Message not available
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, Cory Coager, 2013/03/07
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] no-compression still compresses?, edgar . soldin, 2013/03/07