Re: [Duplicity-talk] GPL-3

[edgar . soldin]

Just to remember you all. Changing license is practically impossible, because 
we would need permission from all contributors up to the current state. On the 
other hand, gpl2 is always licensed to gpl2 _or_ any later license (users 
choice).

ede/duply.net

On 09.04.2011 21:21, Michael Terry wrote:
> Well, it's not like it's urgent that the license be changed either.  I
> just remembered that whole issue recently is all.
> -mt
> 
> On 9 April 2011 09:35, Kenneth Loafman <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I'm mixed about this.  Nokia dropped Maemo, but the Maemo group is still
>> alive.  I'm not sure how active it is, so we would possibly be leaving them
>> at a dead end if we upped it to GPL-3.  I could always just pull the project
>> from the Maemo site, I guess.  There was never much interest in it.
>>
>> ...Ken
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Michael Terry <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello!  I just realized today that since Nokia has abandoned Maemo
>>> (and Linux in general it seems), the major proponent of a GPL-2
>>> license in duplicity probably no longer cares.  Is there interest in
>>> bumping the license again?
>>>
>>> -mt
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk