Re: [Duplicity-talk] (Option to) Cache retrieved volumes between (fetching/restoring) runs locally?!

[edgar . soldin]

On 19.11.2010 12:12, Tim Riemenschneider wrote:
> Am 19.11.2010 11:25, schrieb address@hidden:
>> On 18.11.2010 21:38, Daniel Hahler wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Indeed it doesn't. I always expected duplicity to work with
>>>> exclude/include also on restoring. It doesn't. Currently you can
>>>> obviously only restore all or one file/folder. For the latter. It is
>>>> the folder only without it's contents ;).
>>>
>>>
>>> While I have not verified it (and don't know if you're joking), but it
>>> seemed like the contents of a folder gets restored completely - at least
>>> the files contained therein.
>>
>> _I tried it and the resultr was an empty folder_. No joke here.
> Was that with duply or duplicity itself? 

duply, but this only computes the commandline and does not change duplicity 
functionality

>With duplicity, it works as
> expected:
> 

You are totally right. I redid the test 'duply profile fetch folder'. It works! 
My bad, dunno what I did wrong before. I hereby modify my statement:

Restoring of single files and folders with incremental content is possible with 
--file-to-restore parameter.

Sorry for the confusion, ede/duply.net