[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Duplicity-talk] Multiple backends (for instance local/network + S3)

From: Kenneth Loafman
Subject: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Multiple backends (for instance local/network + S3)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:47:41 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20090817)

Olivier Berger wrote:
> Le lundi 15 mars 2010 à 17:53 +0100, Simon Ruderich a écrit :
>> Yes, that's true. But if you have different backup versions (one
>> in local LAN and on on S3) you must do a complete backup using
>> duplicity anyway, so this can't be really done in one duplicity
>> run.
> Yes, probably a good point ;)
>> Why not just run Duplicity two times, one for local LAN and one
>> time for S3?
> I believe this can be done... even if it would take longer, and consume
> twice the computing power required.

If you have enough local space (USB drives are cheap!), do your backup
locally, then rsync it out to your remote location(s).  This is the
recommended way to run duplicity and it gives you the benefit of speed
in recovery, plus site protection in case of disaster.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]