[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain
From: |
Kenneth Loafman |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:37:23 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) |
I normally stay with the, now default, 25MB volume size, but 100MB may
be better if you have a really large backup. It's all tuning.
As to frequency, I would suggest a full every week and incrementals
every day. This means that if a backup should be bad, you won't be out
more than a week or so from the last recoverable backup.
There is no "right" answer, so its all tunable to the usage.
...Ken
Kennon Ballou wrote:
> Based on how duplicity does incrementals, if you lose one of the
> incrementals or if it is corrupted, as I understand it you will lose
> everything after that in the chain. Because of that, it seems to be a
> good idea to do a new full backup occasionally.
>
> How long is a recommend length of time to go between fulls? I'm running
> right now a daily incremental and a full every 14 days. Does that seem
> to be too short/long? What kind of frequency are you going between fulls?
>
> On a related note, what volume size do you use? I've been going with
> 100mb volumes, as this seemed to be for me a tradeoff between number of
> files and length of time it takes to copy back for a restore. The
> default of 10mb means that for a typical backup I'm going to have
> several thousand volumes; is it actually a better idea to stick with
> small volumes? Is 100mb too big?
>
> Anyway, I'm sure there isn't one "right" answer for any of this, but was
> just curious to hear what you guys use in practice.
>
> | Kennon Ballou
> | Angry Turnip, Inc.
>
> Kenneth Loafman wrote:
>> Announcements will be copied to both duplicity-talk and -announce. I
>> had a couple of requests for an announcements list from folks that did
>> not want to read the -talk list, so I went with it.
>>
>> You don't need to subscribe to -announce if you're already a member of
>> this list.
>>
>> ...Ken
>>
>> address@hidden wrote:
>>> Hey Ken,
>>>
>>> are there that many announcements that you have to split lists or are
>>> there other reasons?
>>>
>>> thx ede
>>> --
>>>> There is a new announcements-only list for duplicity at:
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-announce
>>>>
>>>> This list is moderated and is for announcements regarding duplicity
>>>> backup and related package announcements. All discussion should be
>>>> contained on the duplicity-talk list.
>>>>
>>>> If you want to announce a related package release (ftplicity, Deja Dup,
>>>> etc.), just send it to the list and I will approve the announcement.
>>>>
>>>> ...Thanks,
>>>> ...Ken
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>>>> address@hidden
>>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Duplicity-talk] New Announcements List, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] New Announcements List, edgar . soldin, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] New Announcements List, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/02/13
- [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Kennon Ballou, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain,
Kenneth Loafman <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Marcus Williams, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Kenneth Loafman, 2009/02/13
- Re: Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Gabriel Ambuehl, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Marcus Williams, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, edgar . soldin, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Richard Scott, 2009/02/13
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Suggested increment chain, Richard Scott, 2009/02/13