Re: [Duplicity-talk] Only one signature chain at a time?

[Dylan Martin]

Okay, sound good.  I think the output of collection-status should
probably either mention that this is on purpose or at least not make
it sound like a bad thing.

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:44 AM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
> can these incrementals be restored without their respective sigs?
>
> regards ede
> --
>>
>> Dylan Martin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi, I'm using duplicity to back up some servers.  It seems like the
>>> signatures of any older backup chains get deleted when I create a new
>>> full backup.  Is this intentional?  Does this matter?
>>>
>>
>> It is intentional.  A sig-chain is only used for incremental backups, so
>> as soon as you do another full backup, the sigs for previous backups are
>> destroyed.
>>
>> ...Ken
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Duplicity-talk mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>>
>
>
> --
> public class WhoDidIt{ // A comment. I love comments  private static Person
> sender;
>
>  public static void main (String[] foo){
>
>  sender = new Person();
>  sender.setName(new String[]{"Edgar", "Soldin"});
>
>  Address address = new Address();
>  address.setStreet("Stadtweg 119");
>  address.setZip(39116);
>  address.setCity("Magdeburg");
>  address.setCountry("Germany");
>
>  sender.setAddress(address);
>
>  sender.setMobilePhone(" +49(0)171-2782880 ");
>  sender.setWebSiteUrl(" http://www.soldin.de ");
>  sender.setEmail(" address@hidden ");
>  sender.setPGPPublicKey(" http://www.soldin.de/edgar_soldin.asc ");
>  sender.setGender(true);
>
>  System.out.println(sender.toString());
>  }
> }
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
>