Re: gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=14) - WAS: [Duplicity-talk] Rollup Functionality and Parity?

[Jacob]

On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:18:05 +0200
Edgar Soldin <address@hidden> wrote:

> How is the tampering detection currently realized in terms of informing
> the user? Well if the 'ctb=14' error is in fact a modified archived file
> it actually should be detected before crashing gpg, or not?

In my opinion, if there's data corruption involved, it's top priority. At the 
least, duplicity should at least detect GPG (or is having issues and warn the 
user. Backing up data is duplicity's job, and losing it is a bad thing.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature