[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Duplicity-talk] Re: [Duplicityqtalk] First full backup has no errors, b
From: |
Benjamin Montgomery |
Subject: |
[Duplicity-talk] Re: [Duplicityqtalk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:33:43 -0600 |
When you install duplicity just add '--prefix=/usr/local' to the command
line, and you won't have to worry about interfering with Ubuntu
packages. Ubuntu packages will never put anything in to /usr/local.
You can install the packaged versions of the duplicity dependencies and
you should be all set.
Ben
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 11:58 -0500, Jacob wrote:
> > There have been a fair number of improvements over the last few
> > versions, so the upgrade will be worth it.
>
> I am loath to compile applications on my Ubuntu computer, only because I am
> worried it won't be compatible with who-knows-what package I may happen to
> get later. I would be OK doing this if you could assure me that your setup.py
> script not going to cause compatibility issues down the road.
>
> I plan on moving to Gentoo soon (in fact, that's why I'm backing up) so this
> whole compile issue should disappear then.
>
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, (continued)
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Paul Walker, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Jacob, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Paul Walker, 2007/12/21
Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/12/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Jacob, 2007/12/17
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Gabriel Ambuehl, 2007/12/17
- [Duplicity-talk] Re: [Duplicityqtalk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does,
Benjamin Montgomery <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: [Duplicityqtalk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/12/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: [Duplicityqtalk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Benjamin Montgomery, 2007/12/18
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: [Duplicityqtalk] First full backup has no errors, but --verify does, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/12/18