[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes
From: |
Kenneth Loafman |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Oct 2007 07:48:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (X11/20070824) |
Did you ever get a resolution to this?
...Ken
Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> Try running with -v9, then posting the output, starting with the command
> line through the end. That will help me debug it.
>
> ...Ken
>
> Stefan Hoth wrote:
>> Thanks for the hint.
>>
>> Unfortunattly there is now an error but I can't understand it.
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 400, in ?
>> if __name__ == "__main__": main()
>> File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 381, in main
>> if action == "restore": restore(col_stats)
>> File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 194, in restore
>> restore_get_patched_rop_iter(col_stats)):
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
>> 456, in Write_ROPaths
>> for ropath in rop_iter:
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
>> 430, in integrate_patch_iters
>> for patch_seq in collated:
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
>> 331, in yield_tuples
>> setrorps(overflow, elems)
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
>> 320, in setrorps
>> try: elems[i] = iter_list[i].next()
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
>> 78, in filter_path_iter
>> for path in path_iter:
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
>> 91, in difftar2path_iter
>> tarinfo_list = [tar_iter.next()]
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
>> 283, in next
>> if not self.tarfile: self.set_tarfile()
>> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line
>> 278, in set_tarfile
>> self.current_fp = self.fileobj_iter.next()
>> File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 214, in get_fileobj_iter
>> backup_set.volume_name_dict[vol_num],
>> KeyError: 1
>> gpg: Error writing to `-': Datenübergabe unterbrochen (broken pipe)
>> gpg: handle plaintext failed: file write error
>>
>>
>> I tried tp fetch 1 file from the backupdir and all I got was this.
>>
>> - Stevie -
>>
>> Kenneth Loafman schrieb:
>>> Stefan Hoth wrote:
>>>> Hi Ken,
>>>>
>>>> My problem (maybe just in my understanding) is that I wanted to have the
>>>> possibility to go back to an earlier state and fetch e.g. the etc/passwd
>>>> from 2 weeks ago. But without these signatures I'm unable to get earlier
>>>> file,am I?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe I just have got something wrong with the syntax for a filefetch
>>>> with date provided. Would it be possible to give me an example for that
>>>> so I can verify IF I have real problem?
>>> Something like this should work:
>>>
>>> $ duplicity --include=/etc/passwd --restore-time=14d source-URL target
>>>
>>> See TIME FORMATS in the man page for more options on restore time.
>>>
>>> ...Ken
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Stefan Hoth, 2007/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Stefan Hoth, 2007/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/10/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Stefan Hoth, 2007/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/10/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes,
Kenneth Loafman <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Stefan Hoth, 2007/10/06
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] new strange behaviour without changes, Kenneth Loafman, 2007/10/06