Re: [Duplicity-talk] Concurrently running duplicities?

[David Schneider-Joseph]

Good point.

How about regular spot checks of individual files and directories?

On May 28, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote:

> On Monday 28 May 2007 20:11:59 David Schneider-Joseph wrote:
> > Alternatively, couldn't the full signatures be regenerated on the
> > destination side, from the files themselves, and compared with the
> > source?  This would obviate the need for a full backup.  Rather, it
> > would just perform a "full verification".
>
> This would circumvent the whole point of having encrypted backup.  
> If the
> destination is allowed to read your files, you can send them  
> unencrypted from
> the beginning...
> _______________________________________________
> Duplicity-talk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk