[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGN
From: |
Norbert Bollow |
Subject: |
Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)) |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Mar 2002 07:52:03 +0100 |
> In either case, yes - this hobbles any program created with
> MS development tools.
With the exception of C# programs, probably, because
corresponding free libs are under construction so that no
non-free libs are going to be necessary for running
typical compiled C# programs.
Concerning other programs, in what ways are they hobbled
exactly? Do you think that this license actually gives
Microsoft legal means to take action against someone who
runs their "redistributable" on a computer which does not
have Microsoft Windows installed? Or is it just (like I
tend to think) a matter of putting "requires Microsoft
Windows" on the box of any software that is produced with
Microsoft's tools?
Greetings, Norbert.
--
A founder of the http://DotGNU.org project and Steering Committee member
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://thinkcoach.com
List hosting with GNU Mailman on your own domain name http://cisto.com
- this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 2002/03/22
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), David Sugar, 2002/03/22
- AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 2002/03/22
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Barry Fitzgerald, 2002/03/22
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)),
Norbert Bollow <=
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 2002/03/23
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Bill Lance, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), David Sugar, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/25
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/25
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/24