[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono...
From: |
Gopal.V |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono... |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:43:41 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Roland Ljungh wrote:
> Since when? Mono is designed to be a developer environment for linux...
Exactly it does not tackle any of the privacy/security/freedom concerns
of .NET .
> Yeah, right! Come on now, why would a compiler and a jit and a classlibrary
> not work without ms software?
You bootstrapped off MS software -- so without MS providing CSC
in the first place , you would be going *fast* nowhere writing a compiler
in C#. So you see MS software does come up in the Mono picture.
--
The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
//===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
\\===<=>===//
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 2002/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 2002/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 2002/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 2002/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Paolo Molaro, 2002/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 2002/03/15
- Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 2002/03/15
Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Roland Ljungh, 2002/03/15
Re: [DotGNU]More compelling reasons against Mono..., Gopal.V, 2002/03/15