[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC
From: |
Gopal.V |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:49:48 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> No. "unmanaged" means native-code, not IL.
> Probably you mean "unverifiable".
To err is human, but to blame it on the computer is ingenious.
Actually I re-checked the MSDN and it turns out that I'm
speaking about "unsafe" and "managed extensions". ie "__gc" "__value"
stuff for calling unmanaged code.
--
The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
//===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
\\===<=>===//
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, S11001001, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/11
- new version of GPL? (was Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), S11001001, 2002/03/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Gopal.V, 2002/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Fergus Henderson, 2002/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC,
Gopal.V <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/12
- Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/12
- Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Gopal.V, 2002/03/12
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/12
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/12
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/12
- Re: Introspector & Treecc (was: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC), Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/13