[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM? |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Aug 2001 20:41:53 +1000 |
Martin Coxall wrote:
> > Are you sure? For example, is the Mono project interested in
> > building a runtime that allows IL-based portable executables
> > to exchange data with programs that come in the form of Java
> > bytecode?
>
> No, I am talking about the IL-runtime that P.Net is seeking to write, not the
> greater good of the dotGNU SEV.
The runtime I discussed in my previous message would
be capable of running both IL and JVM at the same time.
Mono's architecture isn't capable of that without a
massive re-design, which would turn it into a clone of
Portable.NET.
If you want there to be one runtime engine, I couldn't
agree more. Your mission, should you choose to
accept it, is to get Miguel to adopt the better solution.
Have fun. :-)
BTW, the CVS tree on http://savannah.gnu.org/ now has
support for dumping Java .class files using "ildasm".
I checked it in today. Support for .jar files and dumping
the contents of methods are on the way.
> Both Mono and P.Net wish to have one of these
> (or am I mistaken?) and certainly should at least be discussing architecture
> ideas with each other.
What level of architecture? Code? API's? Agreeing
what to call a namespace?
> I guess what I am saying is that I don't think Mr P.Net should have severed
> relations with Mono so thoroughly and so quickly. God knows, Miguel can be
> difficult at times, but he can usually be convinced...
It's up to Miguel to make the next move. He knows my
position on the matter: agree to meet in the middle or
we can't agree at all. I broke off relations because I got
tired of seeing weekly postings from Miguel asking
people to re-invent code I already had.
Miguel knows my e-mail address. If you can convince
him to make an offer to me, all to the better. Until then,
I'll keep plugging along in my own inimitable fashion.
Cheers,
Rhys.
- [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Bill White, 2001/08/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Norbert Bollow, 2001/08/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Martin Coxall, 2001/08/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/08/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/08/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Martin Coxall, 2001/08/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Norbert Bollow, 2001/08/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Martin Coxall, 2001/08/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?,
Rhys Weatherley <=
- [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Martin Coxall, 2001/08/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Norbert Bollow, 2001/08/16
- Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Martin Coxall, 2001/08/16
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Bob Smith, 2001/08/16
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: [DotGNU]Who is working on the IL VM?, Miguel de Icaza, 2001/08/16
- [DotGNU]C# class library, Norbert Bollow, 2001/08/17
- [DotGNU]Re: C# class library, Miguel de Icaza, 2001/08/17
- [DotGNU]Re: C# class library, Norbert Bollow, 2001/08/17
- [DotGNU]Re: C# class library, Miguel de Icaza, 2001/08/17
- [DotGNU]Re: C# class library, Norbert Bollow, 2001/08/17