[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]gcc?
From: |
Charles Iliya Krempeaux |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]gcc? |
Date: |
04 Aug 2001 01:23:47 -0700 |
Hello,
Somewhere on the Portable.NET website...
http://www.southern-storm.com.au/portable_net.html
there an explanation about why it is so difficult a
task to make gcc produce .NET's IL bytecode (or Java's
JVM bytecode). The reason is basically because gcc
is very strongly designed to compile to `register based'
instruction sets, and not `stack based' instruction sets
(like IL and JVM).
See ya
Charles Iliya Krempeaux
On 04 Aug 2001 08:49:38 +0200, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> Scott Lanham <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > I was wondering what the status of getting gcc to compile to
> > byte code is? Is it still being considered as an option?
>
> I think that the current status is
>
> http://dotgnu.org/helpwanted/gcc.htm
>
> Greetings, Norbert.
>
> --
> A member of FreeDevelopers and the DotGNU Core Team http://dotgnu.org
> Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
> Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://thinkcoach.com
> Your own domain with all your Mailman lists: $15/month http://cisto.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
- [DotGNU]gcc?, Scott Lanham, 2001/08/04
- Re: [DotGNU]gcc?, Norbert Bollow, 2001/08/04
- Re: [DotGNU]gcc?,
Charles Iliya Krempeaux <=
- Re: [DotGNU]gcc?, Scott Lanham, 2001/08/04
- Re: [DotGNU]gcc?, Charles Iliya Krempeaux, 2001/08/04
- Re: [DotGNU]gcc?, Norbert Bollow, 2001/08/04
- Re: [DotGNU]gcc?, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/08/05
- Re: [DotGNU]gcc?, Keith Poole, 2001/08/05
- Re: [DotGNU]gcc?, John, 2001/08/05
- Re: [DotGNU]gcc?, David Sugar, 2001/08/05
- Re: [DotGNU]gcc?, Keith Poole, 2001/08/06
- Re: [DotGNU]gcc?, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/08/06
- Re: [DotGNU]gcc?, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/08/06