[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DMCA-Activists] Rep. Blasted for Open-Source Attack
From: |
Seth Johnson |
Subject: |
[DMCA-Activists] Rep. Blasted for Open-Source Attack |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:21:27 -0400 |
-------- Original Message --------
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:08:43 -0400
From: Vin <address@hidden>
Anybody who knows where to look, I would appreciate info on
which House members signed which letter, or how I could find
that out. I'll be adding the letter signings to the web
site compilation of voting records on DMCA, P2P hacking
bill, other drm bills, other anti-tech, anti-consumer,
anti-fair use voting records of Senators and Congressmen.
Thanks.
Vin.
> http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=528&ncid=528&e=1&u=/ap/20021024/ap_on_go_co/congress_microsoft
By D. IAN HOPPER, AP Technology Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - A congressman from Microsoft Corp.'s home
state has been criticized by the chairman of a House
technology committee for an attack on the free software
movement.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers had written a letter this
week urging White House computer security adviser Richard
Clarke to find sales opportunities for government-funded
software projects. The letter had no mention of the issue
of free software, also known as open-source or General
Public License (GPL) software.
But when Rep. Adam Smith (news, bio, voting record),
D-Wash., whose biggest political contributor is Microsoft,
began circulating the letter to his fellow Democrats asking
for their signatures, he added his own correspondence
saying the free software philosophy is "problematic and
threaten(s) to undermine innovation and security."
The open-source movement advocates that software, such as
the Linux (news - web sites) operating system, should be
distributed free and open to modification by others rather
than be treated as copyright-protected, for-profit
property.
Smith's attack on open-source drew an angry response from
one of the original authors of the letter, Rep. Tom Davis,
R-Va., chairman of the House Government Reform subcommittee
on technology and procurement policy.
"We had no knowledge about that letter that twisted this
position into a debate over the open source GPL issues,"
said Melissa Wojciak, staff director of the subcommittee.
Wojciak added that Davis supports government funding of
open-source projects.
Smith spokeswoman Katharine Lister said he has "definitely
spoken with (Microsoft) about this issue," but that there
wasn't a direct relationship between those discussions and
his decision to write his letter to fellow Democrats.
Sixty-seven representatives signed the letter to Clarke;
almost two-thirds were Democrats. "I'm going to hope that
the people who signed on to the letter did their homework,"
Lister said.
Microsoft, whose Windows operating system competes with
Linux, says open-source hurts a company's right to protect
its intellectual property.
Microsoft is Smith's top source of donations. According to
the Center for Responsive Politics, Microsoft employees and
its political action committee have given $22,900 to
Smith's re-election campaign.
The original letter was fashioned by Davis and Jim Turner,
D-Texas. They wanted the White House's national
cybersecurity plan, which is set to be finished next month,
to ensure that companies that develop software using
federal funds are free to use the resulting products for
commercial gain.
Clarke and his top spokeswoman were traveling and did not
return a message seeking comment.
The debate over open source in government has raged over the
past year. Supporters say open source software is more
secure, cheaper to buy and maintain and easier to
customize. Several federal agencies use the Linux operating
system to some degree, and the National Security Agency
briefly developed a more secure version of Linux that it
released under the GPL.
A study completed this summer for the Pentagon (news - web
sites) by Mitre Corp. recommended further use of computing
systems using Linux on the grounds that they are less
vulnerable to computer attacks and far cheaper.
Many companies do make money from open-source software,
including Sun Microsystems and IBM Corp. Red Hat, a company
that distributes Linux, sells proprietary software in
addition to the open-source Linux and charges for service
and support.
Microsoft Corp., however, has lobbied the government to
reject GPL software. Last year, Microsoft chief executive
Steve Ballmer called Linux a "cancer" that destroys
intellectual property rights.
An open-source supporter said the issue shouldn't be swayed
by lobbying.
"Before congressmen start signing letters, there should be
more debate on the subject," said Tony Stanco of George
Washington University's Cyber Security Policy and Research
Institute. "The weight of people who are really in the know
go against this kind of stance."
___
On the Net:
General Public License: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
Rep. Adam Smith: http://www.house.gov/adamsmith/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [DMCA-Activists] Rep. Blasted for Open-Source Attack,
Seth Johnson <=