dmca-activists
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[DMCA-Activists] David Reed on FCC Spectrum Policy Process


From: Seth Johnson
Subject: [DMCA-Activists] David Reed on FCC Spectrum Policy Process
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 16:32:56 -0400

> http://www.satn.org/archive/2002_08_11_archive.html#85342790

FCC Spectrum Policy process looks promising 

Last Friday, 8/9/02, I participated in an FCC Public
Workshop on Spectrum Rights and Responsibilities (available
in RealVideo: http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/mt080902.ram). I
was particulary heartened by Chairman Michael Powell's
introductory remarks. Here is a man who really wants to
change things in spectrum policy. He brought in Paul
Kolodzy, a real technology guy from DARPA, to create a
Spectrum Policy Task Force, and Paul has been making things
happen in a way that most FCC watchers have never seen
before. Both panels were particularly interesting. The first
one, which I participated in, was about technology change
and its impact on Spectrum Policy - and it was very
interesting to hear different points of view. The second one
was about policy changes. I was particularly encouraged by
Tom Hazlett's attempt to bridge the gap between the
"commons" folks and the "secondary markets" folks - pointing
out that what we really need is a "cheap" means of
allocating spectrum, whether technically based or
auction-based.

I think this panel, and the other one I participated in on
8/1/02 about unlicensed RF technology (RealVideo:
http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/mt080102.ram), were very
important, and I hope enlightening.

All of the workshops are accessible on the FCC website
(http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/workshops.html). 
-- 

[CC] Counter-copyright:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cc/cc.html

I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or
distribution of this incidentally recorded communication. 
Original authorship should be attributed reasonably, but
only so far as such an expectation might hold for usual
practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no
claim of exclusive rights.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]