[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mulle-objc #MakeObjCGreatAgain
From: |
Steven R. Baker |
Subject: |
Re: mulle-objc #MakeObjCGreatAgain |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:12:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.4.0 |
On 01/12/16 12:06, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 1 Dec 2016, at 07:43, Steven R. Baker <steven@stevenrbaker.com> wrote:
>> I would like to add an additional concern. I know that LLVM and clang are
>> the new hotness, but they're de facto owned by Apple now. It won't be long
>> before there are new and hot features that are in Apple's own version of
>> LLVM, and it'll be very desirable to depend on these new and hot features.
> This is simply not true. Apple’s contributions, as a percentage of the
> total, have been decreasing for the last five years. It’s been several years
> since they were responsible for over 50% of total development and they’re not
> even the largest single contributor anymore (Google is). Apple’s release
> process for LLVM is to fork at a point from svn head, run a bunch of
> additional tests, and backport any fixes from a specific branch. This code
> then appears on opensource.apple.com - occasionally it includes a few hacky
> fixes for issues on Darwin that they haven’t upstreamed because upstream
> won’t accept it until they tidy it up and do it properly.
It might not be true today. But at some point, Apple will see fit to not
give back a feature. A feature that people will depend on.
We've all seen this happen *many* times. And we'll see it again. And
some people will act surprised.
-Steven