[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please, no GitHub
From: |
ChanMaxthon |
Subject: |
Re: Please, no GitHub |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:44:16 +0800 |
Richard:
> On Dec 14, 2015, at 14:38, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
>> If you want people to host their free software at somewhere other
>> than Github can you list a few options that have the same level of
>> quality of service as Github?
>
> Our goal is to give computer users freedom. We develop the GNU system
> so users can use computers in freedom.
>
> Freedom sometimes requires a sacrifice. Crucial for leading others to
> join in defending freedom is to set an example of making freedom our
> priority. We sacrifice convenience for freedom, not vice versa.
> Fortunately, the sacrifice here is small.
For some of us this sacrifice of convenience can be a roadblock, especially for
GNUstep (try type [NSApplicationDelegate
application:didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:] without referring to any reference
material. A handful eh? That is the very first line of Objective-C code the
library calls for a GUI app.)
It is exactly this convenience issue being the roadblock of me contributing to
those projects. I am trying to sort out such inconveniences by creating a set
of new tools under the umbrella name StepCode (won't be GPL-licensed though, it
carries the 3c-BSDL) based on LLVM/clang (also not GPL code)
>> There is a package called GitBucket that packs (almost) all Github
>> features and quality of service. It is free software, can be
>> hosted standalone, and I don’t think Savannah team will have any
>> problem maintaining an instance (which takes absolutely zero
>> effort).
>
> GitBucket sounds like a good thing, but we need to check the facts.
> Supposing it turns out as good as you present it, services running
> GitBucket will probably satisfy most of our repo criteria too (but not
> automatcally all of them).
>
> I will ask the Savannah hackers to look at it and consider whether
> running it on Savannah makes sense. I can foresee that integrating it
> with the rest of Savannah may take work. Running GitBucket as a
> separate service is also an option we can consider.
>
> The Savannah volunteers are overloaded already. Thus, anything I ask
> them to do is going to take time. If someone would please volunteer
> to join that team, that would greatly help us to provide bettet service
> and make improvements.
>
> --
> Dr Richard Stallman
> President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
> Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
> Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>
- Re: Please, no GitHub, (continued)
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Derek Fawcus, 2015/12/12
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Richard Stallman, 2015/12/13
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Tim Sheridan, 2015/12/13
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Richard Stallman, 2015/12/14
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Luboš Doležel, 2015/12/12
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Richard Stallman, 2015/12/12
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Derek Fawcus, 2015/12/12
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Richard Stallman, 2015/12/13
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Maxthon Chan, 2015/12/13
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Richard Stallman, 2015/12/14
- Re: Please, no GitHub,
ChanMaxthon <=
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Maxthon Chan, 2015/12/12
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/12
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Maxthon Chan, 2015/12/12
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/13
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/13
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Richard Stallman, 2015/12/13
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Maxthon Chan, 2015/12/13
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Riccardo Mottola, 2015/12/13
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Gaël Elegoët, 2015/12/13
- Re: Please, no GitHub, Richard Stallman, 2015/12/13