[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is anyone using -fobjc-gc?
From: |
ChanMaxthon |
Subject: |
Re: Is anyone using -fobjc-gc? |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:08:26 +0800 |
I would suggest getting rid of -fobjc-gc and let ARC handle NSMatrix.
Apple have long dropped GC support in Xcode so I think no recent project will
suffer from this loss, and since most of the Objective-C writers now have more
or less some experience tackling iOS where GC never existed in the first place,
this is even less of a problem.
However we should put more focus on fixing Toll-Free Bridging and embrace for
the impact of Apple open sourcing Swift.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 21, 2015, at 18:34, Fred Kiefer <fredkiefer@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 21.08.2015 um 12:14 schrieb David Chisnall <theraven@sucs.org>:
>>
>> It was possible to compile -base (and, I think, -gui) in Apple-compatible
>> GC-optional mode, where retain and release are used, but so are the GC
>> hooks, allowing the frameworks to be shipped in one binary that could work
>> with RR or GC programs, but I have not tried this for some years and do not
>> have a great deal of confidence that it still works.
>
> As for gui, they only place where the GC macros get used is NSMatrix and I
> was about to remove them silently, as I didn't believe in this special magic
> anyway.
>
> Fred
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep