[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License
From: |
Liam Proven |
Subject: |
Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:12:03 +0100 |
On 18 September 2013 14:30, David Chisnall <theraven@sucs.org> wrote:
> You are trying to combine a COTS business model (charging per use) with open
> source and that simply doesn't work. You need to either sell proprietary
> COTS software, or adopt a business model that works with open source.
This.
I agree with all the rest of the message too, but this is for me the key point.
--
Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven@cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven@hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, (continued)
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, David Chisnall, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Pirmin Braun, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Markus Hitter, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, David Chisnall, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Markus Hitter, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Pirmin Braun, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Ivan Vučica, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, Liam Proven, 2013/09/19
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License, David Chisnall, 2013/09/18
- Re: draft of a new Open Source Commercial License,
Liam Proven <=