discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NSView boundsRotation


From: Bluna Ratimonkey
Subject: Re: NSView boundsRotation
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:49:29 +0700

Too long and thanks for all the fish!

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
<hns@goldelico.com> wrote:
>
> Am 14.07.2011 um 21:50 schrieb Bluna Ratimonkey:
>
>> Wait, why this came to discuss-gnustep rather gnustep-dev lol.
>
> Well,
> because the "feature" that you reply to the author *only* is the most
> error prone feature I know...
>
> This time I had to type the address - and again you can see that humans
> make mistakes - did use the wrong one.
>
> My idea of technology is to avoid such mistakes. This is why I would
> prefer that a simple Reply goes to the list I received the mail from...
>
> IMHO all mailing lists can be configured either way.
>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Bluna Ratimonkey <object@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
>>> <hns@goldelico.com> wrote:
>>>> Yes. Because I prefer lists where "Reply" goes to the list, because a list 
>>>> is a list
>>>> and private communication is private...
>>>
>>> Ha! You start acting like David! You guys better count to 10 before
>>> clicking Send!
>
> I don't have the time to wait that long. I simply *expect* in my view of 
> user-friendlyness
> that if I receive something from a list, the reply goes to the list and I 
> don't have
> to treat that situation differently from replying to a personal mail...
>
> But let's stop this side-discussion here - I don't have any spare time to 
> discuss that
> to an end. If I had, I would already have solved the boundsRotation 
> "mechanics"...
>
> -- hns
>
>



-- 
/* Join Bluna Ratimonkey (漫画家) and build the real future for GNUstep ! */
   [@"http://mus3.sourceforge.net"; setNeedsYourHelps:YES!!];



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]