discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Totally Gormless


From: Armando Di Cianno
Subject: Re: Totally Gormless
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:00:58 -0400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2005-10-12 15:08:14 -0400 Nicola Pero
<nicola.pero@operatelecom.com> wrote:
Btw, talking of Windows, I think using GNUstep.conf on Windows too would be better than the Windows registry. :-)
<snip>
.... and having special code to deal with it seems a waste of time and
effort if GNUstep.conf could work exactly as well (and with the same
mechanisms) on Windows.

Reading through the email discussion on discuss-gnustep from 2004-1,
posted by Adam Fedor, I feel like we should at least use a Windows
"native" GNUstep.ini file (in .ini format), with exactly similar usage
as GNUstep.conf on *NIX.

Not sure if the full-time Windows+GNUstep users feel strongly one way
or the other, though; in the end, both are just text files.

__Armando Di Cianno
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail

iD8DBQFDTV1owgiTPLI9xhcRAhH8AJ9IEnpoWGGP7WJL1bi/6Rg96/H+aQCdFa89
SIjSWVnH4WDl31IvLJhp5EY=
=EUW0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]