Re: RIGS bottoming out in rbbr

[Larry Coleman]

Matt,

I am currently (though admittedly not very actively)
maintaining RIGS. I haven't updated my source tree in
a couple of months. I'll update tonight and make sure
RIGS at least compiles.

As for the object hierarchy, I'm not really qualified
to answer that question, but I'm sure the others can. 

Larry

--- Matthew D Swank <akopa@comcast.net> wrote:

> I realize (or least it seems to me) that RIGS is no
> longer maintained. 
> However, with a few changes the cvs version
> compiles. I tried using rbbr 
> to look at the class hierarchy generated by the
> binding, but rbbr would 
> seg-fault whenever it tried access the superclass of
> NSObject or 
> NSProxy.  I decided to overload the superclass class
> method for each 
> class to return 'nil' (and later on: 'Object').  nil
> stopped the 
> seg-faults, but produced other errors when rbbr
> tried to access nil's 
> metaclass.  Having these two superclass methods
> return Object seems to 
> work just fine.  My question is: Is this a
> reasonable solution?  Will I 
> run into any trouble if ruby thinks the two GNUstep
> root objects derive 
> from Object?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Matt
> 
> btw thanks for the help on StepTalk.  The current
> STScriptObject 
> interface was on the Wiki, I think, but I haven't
> been able to access 
> the site for a while.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
>
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
> 



                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250