Re: fat binaries (or whatever)?

[Alex Perez]

Patrix wrote:

> I was about to show the concept to a friend of mine and I had a big
> surprise when the feature was gone lol.
the feature is not gone, it's just disabled by default because less than 
1% of people were using it. GNUstep still supports it. In fact, you can 
even have a hybrid Cocoa/Mac OS X/GNUstep/ix86 fat binary, since the 
directory structures are different.

> When last I used gnustep a year or two ago, a .app had a directory
> structure inside relating to operating system, display backend, etc,
> and finally a binary. This was to allow fat binaries or whatever they
> call them, that could run the same .app on multiple OSes, if I
> remember correctly. Now the binary just sits at whatever.app/whatever.
> Is there a reason for this?
see above. It's still supported.