Re: Excellent technical overview of D-BUS

[Rogelio Serrano]

On 2004-09-01 15:20:06 +0800 Rogelio Serrano 
<rogelio@smsglobal.net> wrote:

> On 2004-09-01 14:54:02 +0800 Richard Frith-Macdonald 
> <richard@brainstorm.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > On 1 Sep 2004, at 06:59, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
>
> > > I agree. I think it is better to extend gdomap so it becomes 
> > > D-BUS daemon 
> > > like .
> >
> > That's not what I meant.  I don't see any reason to extend 
> > gdomap to be 
> > like the
> > d-bus daemon.  The two daemons do different jobs, and if we 
> > want to use 
> > something
> > like d-bus, we should probably just use d-bus.
>
> I see. I think the idea of D-BUS as a 'bus' is beginning to 
> lose appeal for 
> me.
[snip]

What about cases where i have to connect to more than one 
object and maintain those connections?


--
Blood is thicker then water... And much tastier
                            John Davidorff Pell