[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator
From: |
David Stes |
Subject: |
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:57:55 GMT |
User-agent: |
tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.18 (i686)) |
In comp.lang.objective-c Sherm Pendley <spamtrap@dot-app.org> wrote:
>
> It's a place where NeXT never existed, POC is
> the only Objective-C implementation,
POC (http://users.pandora.be/stes/compiler.html) at least doesn't use the
crippled Apple memory management.
The Apple memory management is especially inferior for stuff like
enumerators, because you are forced to keep a counter of how many times you
are autoreleasing inside a loop. The reason is that "modulo" a certain
number of loop iterations, you have to free the pool yourself or it will
consume all memory. In fact, it may be that you have plenty of memory left,
but just that the stupid autoreleasepool is using all of it ...
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Michael Ash, 2004/04/20
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, James Spencer, 2004/04/20
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
- POC destructors? (was Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator), Ben Golding, 2004/04/23
- Re: POC destructors? (was Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator), Helge Hess, 2004/04/23
- Re: POC destructors? (was Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator), Laurent Deniau, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23