Re: Some questions regarding GNUstep (again)

[S.J.Chun]

>From my experiance, DO also works for simple tools (in GNUstep Base Source). 
>Not sure
for complex case. And for GUI, at least for me, is not proper for production 
environment.
I think Base can be used for your application and GUI to be created with Win32 
API. I did
make a simple administation tool (with Win 32 GUI) for management and for us, 
it's not
a problem installing GNUstep Base. With install shield packaging system, whole 
application
+ gnustep-base installed like a breeze. (Think that gnustep-base is like a MFC 
in VC++).

Hope this can help you.


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Fred Kiefer <fredkiefer@gmx.de>
  To: "Y. J. Chun" <yjchun@mac.com>
  Cc: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
  Sent: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:26:04 +0200
  Subject: Re: Some questions regarding GNUstep (again)

  Y. J. Chun wrote:
  > 
  > 1. Is it possible to build a standalone executable that does not require
  > GNUstep installation? I want to deploy our product without any external
  > dependency. If I could just ship our product along with  
  > libgnustep-base.so.1,
  > that is ok as our product already has internal libraries. But i see  
  > GNUstep
  > installation has additional support files. Is there any way i can go  
  > without
  > those files but just a single gnustep library?
  > 
  
  I dont have any experience with this, but would expect this to be 
  possible for a pure base application which does not use DO.