Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h?

[Ziemowit Laski]

On 6 Feb, 2004, at 14.19, Andrew Pinski wrote:

> On Feb 6, 2004, at 14:14, Ziemowit Laski wrote:
>
> > On 6 Feb, 2004, at 14.07, Ziemowit Laski wrote:
> >
> > > On 6 Feb, 2004, at 14.02, Alexander Malmberg wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ziemowit Laski wrote:
> > > > >    typedef struct objc_super {
> > > > >      id      self;                           /* Id of the object 
> > > > > sending
> > > > >                                                  the message. */
> > > > >      Class class;                              /* Object's super 
> > > > > class.
> > > > > */
> > > > >    } Super, *Super_t;
> > > > [snip]
> > > > > So, do you think it would be OK to rename 'class' above to, say,
> > > > > 'super_class'?
> > > >
> > > > This field is used in GNUstep. What do you propose that code should 
> > > > do
> > > > to work with both versions? Change the name only if __cplusplus is
> > > > defined?
> > >
> > > Change the name unconditionally... please? :-)
> >
> > Of course, this only applies to stuff in headers that may get pulled 
> > into
> > a C++/ObjC++ translation unit.  I just noticed that GNU libobjc has 
> > local
> > objects named 'class' in its .c and .m files, which is fine.
>
>
> But the structs are used in GNUStep and which cannot change just 
> support one version of
> gcc.  They have to support multiple versions of gcc.  I rescind my ok 
> on this.  Knowing that
> programs will brake.  Also changing it conditional on __cplusplus is 
> okay with me as it is
> okay with Alex.

OK, I'll do the conditional change.

--Zem
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ziemowit Laski                 1 Infinite Loop, MS 301-2K
Mac OS X Compiler Group        Cupertino, CA USA  95014-2083
Apple Computer, Inc.           +1.408.974.6229  Fax .5477