[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does apple-apple-apple work?
From: |
David Ayers |
Subject: |
Re: Does apple-apple-apple work? |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:05:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 |
Philip Mötteli wrote:
Hi Adam, David et all
[snip]
Thanks for the offer! I will try to use it for the next issue, which
is probably very easy: I can actually compile GDL2 now – until the
linker stage:
Making all for library libgnustep-db2control...
Linking library libgnustep-db2control ...
/usr/bin/libtool: can't locate file for: -l-lgnustep-base
/usr/bin/libtool: file: -l-lgnustep-base is not an object file (not
allowed in a library)
I think, this is just a syntax error. Somehow, the makefile has this
line in a weird way, such that there's no library name given for the
first "-l", is it?
Hmm, this seems to be related to:
/EOControl/GNUmakefile:
libgnustep-db2control_LIBRARIES_DEPEND_UPON = -lgnustep-base
which in the apple-apple-apple case is wrong... it should be
/EOControl/GNUmakefile:
libgnustep-db2control_LIBRARIES_DEPEND_UPON = -lgnustep-baseadd
(and potentially some -fFoundation magic... but I'm not sure.)
BTW: Is this true?
libgnustep-db2.so == EOAccess
libgnustep-db2control.so == EOControl
libgnustep-base.so == Foundation + GNUstepBase-Additions
almost,
libgnustep-base == GNUstepBase (incl. Additions)
but you should have
libgnustep-baseadd == GNUstepBase-Additions
(which in turn could depend upon Foundation somehow.)
I hope I can find time to fix the GDL2 part this afernoon.
Cheers,
David